Re:56% of Americans have Internet data caps; FCC asked to in...
by MatthewB on Friday May 06, 2011 @04:20PM
(#2522327)
True, but neither do cell phone mintes to a cellular company. They just figured out a way to make the economics work while providing a better service to users.
Re:56% of Americans have Internet data caps; FCC asked to in...
by achompas on Saturday May 07, 2011 @12:32PM
(#2523986)
Right. Unlike wireless minutes, though, ISPs would directly help their competition by offering rollover bandwidth:
http://acompa.net/blog/2011/05/why-isps-will-not-offer-rollo...
Re:56% of Americans have Internet data caps; FCC asked to in...
by AretNCarlsen on Friday May 06, 2011 @04:21PM
(#2522329)
I disagree completely. It's just like real estate: since I only use about 50% of the floor space in my apartment at any given time, I roll over my unused square footage and only pay rent every other month.
Re:56% of Americans have Internet data caps; FCC asked to in...
by MatthewB on Saturday May 07, 2011 @12:40AM
(#2523220)
The difference is when you don't use your bandwidth, the company benefits, but when you don't use your square footage, a company doesn't gain anything.
Re:56% of Americans have Internet data caps; FCC asked to in...
by vladd on Saturday May 07, 2011 @04:54AM
(#2523429)
The ISP company only benefits if their pipe is saturated 100% at that moment. If they had spare capacity at that point in time, it's of no use to them and they can't carry it over.
Because user bandwidth is not, by definition, a persistent commodity. ISPs do not accrue bandwidth every month they are under capacity, so why should users?