Re:An upcoming story about Coinbase
by jolux on Thursday November 26, 2020 @12:06AM
(#25217022)
Implicit bias is extremely hard to argue in the absence of other examples of racist behavior. In the court of public opinion, well. I think you're doing well as a baseline if the only arguments someone can make are about implicit bias. An accusation of implicit bias is far easier to defend against than one of racial abuse.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:An upcoming story about Coinbase
by AnimalMuppet on Thursday November 26, 2020 @12:34AM
(#25217173)
Not sure that's true. An allegation of racial abuse you defend against by saying "I did not do that", hopefully with evidence on your side (other people were at the meeting, maybe).
But how do you defend against implicit bias? "No, I'm not"? In the current climate, I'm not sure that saves your public image...
You can always claim not to have acted with bias but if there’s strong evidence that you did then I’m not sure how one is supposed to defend against it, in an informal sense (IANAL). I would just admit it, make amends, and try to move on.
Re:An upcoming story about Coinbase
by AnimalMuppet on Thursday November 26, 2020 @01:43PM
(#25222540)
But if there's strong evidence that you acted with bias, then isn't that evidence of explicit bias? I'm not even sure what strong evidence of implicit bias would look like.