Re:That’s not why I did it
by exmadscientist on Wednesday November 25, 2020 @01:30PM
(#25212520)
And for anyone who doesn't realize why your mention of "programmer" is completely appropriate here in discussing an article about weaving, I can only suggest a link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacquard_machine
Mariko Kasako had a lovely talk on weaving, punch cards, & her own neat DIY work. Fun talk, some good history there too, with a bit of the modern too. The Jacquard loom is featured!
Re:That’s not why I did it
by tworingsoft on Wednesday November 25, 2020 @07:28PM
(#25215796)
Shameless plug for an essay [0] I wrote a while back comparing looms and computers (which also has some of the best other videos I could find on looms, for those who want to learn more about them specifically). Wish I had seen this video back then, thanks for sharing! I find this comparison so fascinating to contemplate.
[0]: https://tworingsoft.com/blog/2017/08/29/looms-and-computers....
In particular, this passage about asserting control over chaos resonated with me, as a software developer:
> I sort of think that it has to do with creating calm in chaos. There is so little in the world that we have any control over. But what happens at our looms, that thing, we have control over. And if what happens on our looms becomes total chaos, then patience, tenacity, and time will make it work. That’s why I did it.
Also, here are explanations of some of the weaving terms used in the article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weaving#Process_and_terminolog...
I've never been able to articulate why I got good at coding when I was very young. Growing up in a chaotic household coding gave me an area of life that I could control. This seems obvious to me now.
Thanks for sharing.