News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I asked GPT-3 for the question to “42” by nl on Wednesday November 25, 2020 @07:22AM (#25208446)
> I think unless we really understand what is happening inside GPT-3,

You realise we have debugging tools that let us inspect what is going on inside transformer-based models like GPT-3 right?

> why do we train a system that is supposed to be intelligent on such data?

Because it's available and does interesting things.

> we cannot really tell whether it is really dumb or just playing dumb for the above reason.

No one who works in the field thinks anything approaching this.

I think GPT-3 does raise questions about what intelligence is though.

Re:I asked GPT-3 for the question to “42” by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Wednesday November 25, 2020 @10:54AM (#25210509)
There have been studies to indicate we can predict which decisions people will make before they themselves are consciously aware they have made a decision. I'm not convinced "we can inspect what's going on" is sufficient criteria for ruling out intelligence.
Re:I asked GPT-3 for the question to “42” by nl on Wednesday November 25, 2020 @07:00PM (#25215634)
I agree, and I'd think this goes to the heart of "what is intelligence" and "exactly how intelligent are humans".