Re:A 4-month online dating experiment using 10 fictional sin...
by M2Ys4U on Tuesday November 24, 2020 @10:20PM
(#25205682)
Bumble's whole premise is that (for heterosexual matches at least) women must send the first message.
For the men who were using the apps (and talking about it) in my social circle it doesn't seem like it improved much from this side of the gender divide. YMMV of course.
Re:A 4-month online dating experiment using 10 fictional sin...
by Kalium on Tuesday November 24, 2020 @11:16PM
(#25205994)
Personally, I've been struck by the overwhelming majority of women who match and don't actually send that first message. Matches last at most 48 hours - message or lose them.
Re:A 4-month online dating experiment using 10 fictional sin...
by jandrese on Tuesday November 24, 2020 @09:16PM
(#25205279)
Maybe, but I think that would result in the supermodel looking ones still getting clobbered with requests while the majority of women get nothing.
Re:A 4-month online dating experiment using 10 fictional sin...
by dane-pgp on Wednesday November 25, 2020 @07:16AM
(#25208415)
If men had the choice of messaging one supermodel-looking woman per month (with no guarantee of a reply) or, say, four better-than-average-looking women, I think eventually they would learn to be more realistic in who they approach.
In any case, if the supermodels can set this spamminess/selectiveness parameter for themselves, they can tune it to a value where they don't get clobbered (unless they like the validation of being clobbered).
In fact, rather than hard-coding those rate limits (or generating them algorithmically from the gender distribution of accounts) it might be viable to let each user decide on the limit themselves. It may not be a good idea to show users the specific rate limit that another user has chosen, though, as that number might give all sorts of weird signalling about how "desirable" they consider themselves to be.