Re:A 4-month online dating experiment using 10 fictional sin...
by AnimalMuppet on Tuesday November 24, 2020 @04:58PM
(#25203430)
If you look at it only from the man's perspective, then it may not make much difference. If you look at it from the woman's, though, it may make a difference to her.
If you can't look at it from her point of view, I don't know how to make my statements make any sense to you.
Re:A 4-month online dating experiment using 10 fictional sin...
by vmception on Tuesday November 24, 2020 @05:46PM
(#25203900)
The answer is yes, her pool is broader. Maybe if you keep repeating it non-asian women will start matching with you.
Re:A 4-month online dating experiment using 10 fictional sin...
by AnimalMuppet on Tuesday November 24, 2020 @06:18PM
(#25204178)
I'm not asian. I'm married, and happily, so don't think I'm saying this because it affects me one way or the other.
I'm not sure what the problem is, but we seem to continually be talking past each other. I'm tired of it, so I'm out.
Re:A 4-month online dating experiment using 10 fictional sin...
by vmception on Tuesday November 24, 2020 @06:31PM
(#25204274)
I think you’re out of touch then. I see what perspective you are trying to make happen, its not very relevant. The answer was “yes”, three times now. You are trying to make this other Hallmark fanfiction happen thats just isn't the worth entertaining.
If your numbering system introduced only now in this reply is regarding physical attractiveness, then women don't have this issue in their own race.
The point is that this doesn't help asian men because it barely makes a dent in the pool of asian men that would ever be exposed to a women with this predilection, as her pool is so much larger and also includes asian men. Even if her pool only included asian men in this strategy, from the perspective of the men, nothing has changed because the odds they will be exposed to it are slim.
My reply is only about the men's UX, not your "arbitrage" from the woman's UX.