New stable release of Go

Re:New stable release of Go by swannodette on Thursday May 05, 2011 @03:49PM (#2518693)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New stable release of Go by uriel on Thursday May 05, 2011 @04:09PM (#2518741)

I thought you were talking about performance, in which case the relevant chart is:

Which shows Go is well ahead of OCaml.

The "which language is best" chart you linked has rather arbitrary weighting.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New stable release of Go by igouy on Thursday May 05, 2011 @04:30PM (#2518795)

Both pages show "performance" - they show 2 different summary statistics of "performance".

> The "which language is best" chart you linked has rather arbitrary weighting.

That chart has exactly the same "weighting" as the chart you say is "the relevant chart"!

> Which shows Go is well ahead of OCaml.

Which shows the time measurements for those programs with Go 6g and OCaml completely overlap

The time measurements are similar for both Go 6g and OCaml -

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New stable release of Go by igouy on Thursday May 05, 2011 @05:14PM (#2518934)

Did you downvote my reply instead of trying to justify your own comments ?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:New stable release of Go by chc on Thursday May 05, 2011 @05:21PM (#2518960)

You can't downvote replies to your own comments on Hacker News, so that seems unlikely unless he's sock-puppeting.

[ Parent | on HN ]