News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Oxford University breakthrough on global COVID-19 vaccine by mytailorisrich on Monday November 23, 2020 @04:47AM (#25185101)
I agree that in cases of overwhelming national interests patents and licensing should be ignored if they stand in the way.

But: this is not a medicine made of a molecule that can be synthesised by the chemical industry. Such a vaccine requires input from the creator and then specialist equipment to manufacture. Poor countries don't have the infrastructure to manufacture and the creator labs are not going to tell you how to produce the vaccine just because you ask them.

In any case, governments should pressure labs to enforce an low prove.

Re:Oxford University breakthrough on global COVID-19 vaccine by usrusr on Monday November 23, 2020 @07:58AM (#25186275)
In the context of the vaccination rush I often wonder how military aircraft procurement was doing it when extreme r&d progress and extreme mass production were coinciding during ww2. New types were developed by companies (even the Soviets maintained a healthy competition between design bureaus) but once a type was established and in volume demand it apparently was manufactured wherever a production line could be adapted. Was that just free market subcontracting in the US or did DoD design bids come with something like a premeditated licensing option baked in from the beginning?
Re:Oxford University breakthrough on global COVID-19 vaccine by mytailorisrich on Monday November 23, 2020 @08:40AM (#25186616)
I think that the "free market" stopped to operate during that time. The whole economy was redirected to the war effort and everyone with it.

These programs were federally-funded with the goal to produce as much as possible. For production I'm sure that factories were financially compensated for the work.