Re:To do politics or not do politics? Tech startups are divided
by dash2 on Monday November 23, 2020 @01:19AM
(#25184076)
Is there evidence for that forced sterilisation claim? I found this Guardian story but it only details an allegation, which hardly cuts it for such a serious crime: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/17/ice-hy...
I must admit it sounds like the stuff of paranoid fantasy.
Update: this from Channel 4 seems reasonably calm and balance. I had to hunt through a lot of clickbaity headlines to find it: https://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/factcheck-were-mass-...
Re:To do politics or not do politics? Tech startups are divided
by krageon on Monday November 23, 2020 @07:00AM
(#25185803)
> I must admit it sounds like the stuff of paranoid fantasy.
For a country with a documented history of disrespect for bodily autonomy it seems entirely in line with expected behaviour to me.
[dead]
Re:To do politics or not do politics? Tech startups are divided
by nagaiaida on Monday November 23, 2020 @01:47PM
(#25190117)
Does it not?
>Over the six-year period that had followed the passage of the Family Planning Services and Population Research Act of 1970, physicians sterilized perhaps 25% of Native American women of childbearing age, and there is evidence suggesting that the numbers were actually even higher.
https://time.com/5737080/native-american-sterilization-histo...
Re:To do politics or not do politics? Tech startups are divided
by boogies on Monday November 23, 2020 @10:52AM
(#25188021)
Sounds like China to me https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uyghur_genocide#Compulsory_ste...
There is also the issue of why they are incarcerated in the first place. They have committed no crime, migration and seeking refuge is protected under international law.
The UN universal declaration of human rights is written to be easily accessible and understood by the general public. And given that it was written 75 years ago I think they did a good job. I actually recommend everyone to read it entirely in your native language, as it has probably been translated into it and will only take a few minutes. A beautiful document indeed.
The important thing here though is not how rigorously defined these rights are, but the spirit of the law is clearly saying that the family is a fundamental unit of society. Separating the family unit is a failure to uphold that principal.