Whatever your political views are, my point was that there is a clear delineation between parties.

Being apathetic to politics is consequential in and of itself.

As to your claim about immigration, I'm not interested in defending any particular policy position. But, there is some research that indicates immigration boosts overall labor participation [1].

http://giovanniperi.ucdavis.edu/uploads/5/6/8/2/56826033/per...

>Whatever your political views are, my point was that there is a clear delineation between parties.

It doesn't help your case when you lump arguable, but sane positions with denying climate change.

Not especially sane, no.

They're particular to the modern conservative party.

>They're particular to the modern conservative party.

Many of my liberal friends believe in crazy stuff like russiagate or defending BLM looters/rioters or proudly voting for a political candidate that supported bombings in the middle east that lead to the death of countless civilians (including kids) while simultaneously villainizing Dubya for being a war mongering criminal.

You'll have to excuse me for not seeing your "clear delineation" - whatever that means.

Well, some of it's illegal according to treaties the US has ratified.

I'm taking everything that is being proposed in good faith. There is a legal manner in which a country controls who gets to come in. Whether they have to modify treaties or not, I don't know - I'm not an expert on international jurisprudence.