Plato at the Googleplex: Why Philosophy Won't Go Away

Re:Plato at the Googleplex: Why Philosophy Won't Go Away by harperlee on Saturday November 21, 2020 @03:56AM (#25168575)

I think it makes sense: even the utmost atheist needs to have beliefs; both in the ‘individual facts’ way (you can’t be rational about everything all the time), and in the ‘cosmovision’ way (ideas about what to do with one’s life, etc.).

The OP was just being a little bit provocative while calling those beliefs a religion, which I think can be allowed; at least for the fact that there are a bunch of people that are religiously “atheists”.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Plato at the Googleplex: Why Philosophy Won't Go Away by eivarv on Saturday November 21, 2020 @07:01AM (#25169225)

    even the utmost atheist needs to have beliefs

They might, but my point is that they are different - meaning that you therefore can’t categorize it as a religion (not to mention that these answers don’t have anything to do with atheism in and of itself).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Plato at the Googleplex: Why Philosophy Won't Go Away by msla on Monday November 23, 2020 @11:19AM (#25188331)

> I think it makes sense: even the utmost atheist needs to have beliefs

Only if you equivocate on the definition of "belief" as you seem to be.

> both in the ‘individual facts’ way (you can’t be rational about everything all the time)

Of course you can.

[ Parent | on HN ]