Except they don't accurately describe their position. In every press-conference (just as in this) they allege voter-fraud and that they have tons of evidence. However when it comes to the actual court cases and when the lawyers risk being disbarred for lying to the court, suddenly these claims disappear.

So no their own words do not accurately describe their position, which is make unfounded allegations without any evidence to back it up. Also interestingly several of the voter-fraud cases that they bring up (where single people have been prosecuted) are Trump voters committing the fraud, but obviously they don't mention it because it does not fit the story.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-cries-election-fraud-in-c...

According to the press conference (1:27:00), the cases that have been dismissed are not cases from the campaign.

The assertion that there is no evidence is inaccurate. The media has confounded "proof" with "evidence". Sworn affidavits are admissible as evidence. Whether their evidence proves their case or not is up to the courts. Claiming that these are unfounded allegations speaks to the point of my above comment.

There is a widely accepted precedent for not releasing all of the details of a pending court case before it is litigated.

The above are not partisan assertions.

At least Trump fixed that whole Russian Interference thing since people (Twitter, Facebook) seem to be so sure this election was secure.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/05/opinion/election-voting-m...