Now this is handwaving the benefits of satellite internet for remote location a lot. It's not because you are living in a wealthy country that you have access to a decent Internet speed. On the contrary in Canada a lot of places that I wouldn't even dare to call remote have 1-5Mbps download at best, carried through antennas on silos that drop signal on very rainy days.

So to whoever wrote this: I understand why you consider LEO pollution to be a very real issue (it is), but handwaving the positive to try and make your position sound stronger is a poor argumentation technique.