We can do better than DuckDuckGo

Re:We can do better than DuckDuckGo by chris_f on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @07:53PM (#25131917)

> For example this is the #2 result for "python f strings" on DDG[1]. It's total garbage, and, quoting the blog, "we can do better". (This result is also on page 1 for the same query on Google.)

There are other options that may be better, but in general, very few people are looking for them.

Here's your "python f strings" query on Runnaroo:

https://www.runnaroo.com/search?term=python+f+strings

I'm the creator of Runnaroo.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We can do better than DuckDuckGo by edgyquant on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @10:36PM (#25132921)

I tried this out real quick just to see for myself. First it was slow for me, if I wasn’t wanting to try it out I may have closed the tab, but I did a search for a question I recently googled (that was an example of an annoying google search.) I searched “Python arcade sprite opacity“ and while the first three results were the same as google the fourth was a github link to the project itself and brought me to the answer (which wasn’t on page 1 of google for me, although it was on page two.)

So you need to speed it up, but it does look good for searching documentation at least.

[ Parent | on HN ]