News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We can do better than DuckDuckGo by visarga on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @05:33PM (#25130827)
I have had a similar idea, what you're proposing is essentially a ranking/filtering customisation. The internet is a big scene, and on this scene we have companies and their products, political parties, ad agencies and regular users. Everyone is fighting for attention, clicks. Google has control over a ranking and filtering system that covers most searches on the internet. FB and Twitter hold another ranking/filtering sweet spot for social networks.

The problem is that we have no say in ranking and filtering. I think it should be customisable both on a personal and community level. We need a way to filter out the crap and surface the good parts on all these sites. I am sure Google wouldn't like to lose control of ranking and filtering, but we can't trust a single company with such an essential function of our society, and we can't force a single editorial view on everyone.

As we have many newspapers, each with its own editorial views, we need multiple search engine curators as well.

Re:We can do better than DuckDuckGo by absolutelyrad on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @08:22PM (#25132102)
Would you pay $10/yr for this feature?
Re:We can do better than DuckDuckGo by jbay808 on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @02:30AM (#25134080)
Unfortunately I suspect that if it were a premium feature, not enough groups would volunteer the requisite time into compiling and maintaining the site ranking lists. This sort of thing really has to become a community effort in order to scale, I think.