Re:Primary energy vs final energy: why replacing fossil fuel...
by dudus on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @02:19PM
(#25128335)
Ok then the electric baseboard is 30% efficient vs the heatpump which is 100% efficient.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Primary energy vs final energy: why replacing fossil fuel...
by NovemberWhiskey on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @03:03PM
(#25128947)
No; you're missing the point - 100% of the energy in an electric baseboard system is converted into heat. It's 100% efficient. There is no more effective way to turn electricity into heat than resistively.
A heat pump doesn't turn electricity into heat. It moves heat from one place (outside) to another place (inside); and can seem more efficient because the system isn't closed.
Re:Primary energy vs final energy: why replacing fossil fuel...
by dudus on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @05:57PM
(#25131053)
Ah makes sense. Thanks for taking the time to explain
Re:Primary energy vs final energy: why replacing fossil fuel...
by thatcherc on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @02:27PM
(#25128443)
But a resistor converts 100% of the electrical energy it consumes into heat. So if you were to take the same amount of electrical energy and run a heat pump, you could get 3x more heat into a room. In that sense, the heatpump is 300% efficient.
Re:Primary energy vs final energy: why replacing fossil fuel...
by Gibbon1 on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @04:32PM
(#25130164)
Yeah one can argue semantics all one wants but you still get 3 to 4 times more low grade heat per kwh from a heat pump than a resistive heater. And that's what you actually care about.