Could you please not do the denunciatory-escalatory-ideological-fulminatory thing here? We're trying for a different kind of conversation.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

It's hard to think of rich people who are doing more harm than good. Sure, you could argue that for Zuckerberg, Dorsey, and the Sackler family if you want to. But they are a tiny fraction of all rich people.

"Silently rape" is a pretty harsh thing to say.

Would you prefer we had no rich people? There are places like that.

It seems less productive to focus on "rich people" and instead focus on "large corporations", because all of these actions are done in the name of the corporation. An adjustment to corporate law to put the responsibility for actions of corporations on to C-level execs could have positive effects for example.

It is done in the name of corporations by rich people to protect the wealth of rich people. Not really sure why we are trying to speak in euphemisms.