News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Graphics for JVM by MaxBarraclough on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @06:20AM (#25122441)
Do you plan on trying JavaFX?
Re:Graphics for JVM by grandinj on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @06:29AM (#25122496)
Sigh. I had such high hopes for it, and then Oracle abandoned it.

But we are trying it, and opinions (internal to my company) are varied. Some people like it, but I don't. Because (a) it has missing functionality here and there (b) it still has a long road to go to become battle-hardened (c) I don't see any of the current supporters having deep enough pockets to fix (a) and (b)

So we're taking a mostly wait-and-see attitude.

But we have an existing deep and wide investment in Swing in our products, so our risk profile is probably somewhat different to yours.

Re:Graphics for JVM by apta on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @07:21AM (#25122903)
> Sigh. I had such high hopes for it, and then Oracle abandoned it.

As far as I'm aware, it was only pulled from the JVM into a separate dependency, as did several other components, in order to keep the JVM slim. Are you saying development on it stopped altogether?

Re:Graphics for JVM by grandinj on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @07:26AM (#25122935)
Oracle has mostly disbanded the team that was working on it, leaving only one or two staff to manage community contributions.

There are however, a couple of small companies, and some individuals using it, and providing contributions.

Re:Graphics for JVM by fayten on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @09:38AM (#25124173)
Javafx is very much alive at: https://openjfx.io/

Gluon also provides builds for LTS and latest here: https://gluonhq.com/products/javafx/

Re:Graphics for JVM by usrusr on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @07:55AM (#25123168)
Sometimes a setup like that is the best setup possible, no ambitious team trying to make their mark by replacing something that doesn't require replacing or that they can't replace well enough. I doubt that JavaFX would have more impact if they put a team of dozens on it (or, shudder, hundreds) but they would surely make life harder for those who still build on FX. A larger team might have already declared javaFX dead entirely, urging everyone to port to some exciting new javaFY and losing many of the remaining users in the process, without attracting any new ones. Arguably Swing to FX was already a bit like that.
Re:Graphics for JVM by vips7L on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @08:59AM (#25123773)
As far as I know Gluon has taken over the development of JavaFX.
Re:Graphics for JVM by cmiles74 on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @10:28AM (#25124849)
It's not easy to get JavaFX working for development and it's tricky to get it bundled properly for deployment. I can see why they wanted to split out big parts of Java but I think it does discourage developers from using the library.