News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple MBPr 13 M1 cinebench R23 score by sally1620 on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @12:11AM (#25120472)
It is not a fair comparison since 4900HS is a 35w chip. A fair comparison would be 4750U, 15w chip with score of 1184/8008
Re:Apple MBPr 13 M1 cinebench R23 score by Avi-D-coder on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @05:52AM (#25122234)
I'm not comparing on the basis of TDP. I'm comparing performance/dollar.

I fully expect Apple's higher end, higher TDP chips to achieve better performance. But they will cost more money.

Like it or not the M1 is competing in a price bracket with the 4900HS.

Re:Apple MBPr 13 M1 cinebench R23 score by nardras on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @08:57AM (#25123754)
but you will agree that - for a mobile cpu - power consumption and therefore battery life is an important aspect of the equation?
Re:Apple MBPr 13 M1 cinebench R23 score by cbozeman on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @01:29PM (#25127580)
Is it though? A "Pro" laptop has, by the very name, an implication of performance.

I don't know many professionals in any industry that are constrained so heavily by power - generally when you're doing professional work, you're not far from an outlet, save some rare use cases like on-location shoots for film and television.

Re:Apple MBPr 13 M1 cinebench R23 score by Avi-D-coder on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @09:06PM (#25132363)
Absolutely, that's one of the reasons I may buy a first generation Apple product.