News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sweden bans public events of more than eight people by nradov on Monday November 16, 2020 @05:50PM (#25118102)
The null hypothesis is that the differences in death rates between countries are mostly a matter of luck and timing rather than caused by pandemic control measures (or lack thereof). Only a few countries have successfully contained the virus: mainly New Zealand, Vietnam, and possibly Taiwan, China, and Australia. For other countries which still have widespread community transmission we may see the per capita death rates gradually converge (after adjusting for population demographics).

To be clear I'm not claiming that all pandemic control measures are ineffective. We just don't have strong scientific evidence that they are effective at the national level over long periods. Sometimes things just happen randomly. Is it possible that Sweden just flipped the coin to heads a bunch of times in al row and now it finally came up tails?

Re:Sweden bans public events of more than eight people by sampo on Monday November 16, 2020 @06:18PM (#25118359)
> Only a few countries have successfully contained the virus

Every country that has chosen suppression as their strategy, has been able to do it.

Australia, China, Laos, Mongolia, New Zealand, Nigeria, Ruanda, South Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam.

https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToS...

Re:Sweden bans public events of more than eight people by nradov on Monday November 16, 2020 @08:11PM (#25119242)
I should have included South Korea in my list. But for those other developing countries we don't have enough data to conclude whether their containment efforts have been successful or not. They generally haven't done a lot of widespread random population testing. And their population demographics would lead to low per capita death rates even absent any pandemic control measures.
Re:Sweden bans public events of more than eight people by mixedCase on Monday November 16, 2020 @07:49PM (#25119100)
Explain Argentina