Re:Lax oversight allows Chicago police to avoid turning on t...
by pdonis on Monday November 16, 2020 @05:09PM
(#25117682)
> the FBI is meant to handle matters of state or local government corruption
They have a certain amount of ability to do that if the state or local government is violating Federal law. But they do not have general oversight or police powers, since the Federal government as a whole does not. Nor is it supposed to.
Re:Lax oversight allows Chicago police to avoid turning on t...
by bigbubba on Monday November 16, 2020 @05:23PM
(#25117837)
Wouldn't local cops violating people's constitutional rights put them at odds with federal law?
Re:Lax oversight allows Chicago police to avoid turning on t...
by pdonis on Monday November 16, 2020 @06:31PM
(#25118459)
Yes, but that just means prosecuting individual cases. That is very different from trying to make systemic changes in the way local cops operate; those kinds of changes must be made by local governments, and are the kind of changes local citizens should be demanding, and should be voting local governments out of office for not making.
Re:Lax oversight allows Chicago police to avoid turning on t...
by tristor on Monday November 16, 2020 @05:40PM
(#25118002)
Yes, and as a general rule when cases are brought they are under the auspices of a federal civil rights violation. These are very difficult cases to prosecute though, so I think the FBI overfocuses on lower hanging fruit unless there's a political motivation from the top to drive this.
I'm not really familiar with the details, but it's my understanding the Seattle PD are under some sort of probation system with the DOJ, which I'm guessing the FBI was involved with. So I think this sort of thing does happen, though I guess not enough.