> biology or culture

Sorry, no; racism is just about biology, by definition. Culture is not race.

Discrimination based on culture has other terms like xenophobia.

Discriminating against some culture may be justified. For instance, to some extent it is justified to discriminate against a culture that tolerates theft and vandalism.

If you assume that someone with a certain physical appearance automatically belongs some specific culture, and then discriminate against them based on that assumption, that is then racism.

The discriminating against that culture per se isn't racism, and not even necessarily wrong; it depends on the culture.

Not all cultures are equally good.

> Sorry, no; racism is just about biology, by definition. Culture is not race.

Unfortunately, some people have redefined "racism" to mean dislike of anything related to another ethnic group. Biology, culture, religion, whatever.

I agree with you here. Blaming the culture is the opposite of blaming the biology. But the meaning of "racism" has expanded from "blaming biology" to, well, "noticing anything negative about anything". The only non-racist behavior is to say the differences don't exist at all, or blaming them 100% on oppression.

Racism is not about noticing patterns, it's about erroneous generalization and the prejudice they comes with it.

In Bulgaria where gypsies live in poverty, many thieves are gypsies, therefore all gypsies are thieves, therefore not hiring gypsies.

Compare with: many thieves are gypsies because poverty lead to antisocial behaviors.

If Bulgaria and Romania are racist, we beg you, please, take home our gypsies and treat them with respect. They've been integrating into Europe since the 15th century with no measurable success. The Communists tried that hard, too; they gave them free housing, many privileges like they could get into any university without exams. Yet, it would help if you watched documentaries of what they turned those apartment buildings into - the whole complex had to be destroyed as it was inhabitable.

Again and again, a "gypsy" is not a matter of race or ethnicity as there are many well-integrated gypsies who distance themselves from the other gypsies, nobody calls them or considers them to be gypsies - being a gypsy is a matter of social irresponsibility, not following any laws, and having crime (mostly theft) as heritage.

If you look into recent genetic studies, gypsies are descendants from the untouchables caste in India. The same thing they do in Bulgaria and Romania, they've been doing in India, and that's why they were persecuted and moved from Asia to Europe. They were not a different race back in India!

The problem is this "heritage." Not all heritage should be cherished and preserved. As an extreme example, I will give you cannibalism.

Gypsies teach their kids to pickpocket at an early age. It's not considered immoral. In fact, in gypsy culture, theft is only when you take away gold or silver. It's not only a way to make a living for them, but they also consider it an intellectual challenge - how to outsmart people.

Another gypsy heritage is the bride marketplace. Women in the 21st century are sold like cattle. There are tons of documentaries on the subject. Should this heritage be preserved and celebrated, too?

So, let's stop calling Bulgarians and Romanians racists! We're not. It's been 500 years already, and gypsies have killed more Bulgarians and Romanians than Bulgarians and Romanians have killed gypsies. Yes, often older people in the villages are getting tortured and killed over 5 euros.

I can speak about Bulgaria, which has been a multicultural country way before many new Western democracies. We've welcomed thousands and thousands of Armenian refugees; we live in peace with Bulgarian Turks. We have many Jews - we saved all our Jews during WWII even if we were allies of Germany. We have Russians, Greek, Italians, Macedonians, and Serbians living in Bulgaria. During Communism, many Libyans, Lebanese, and Syrians came to study in Bulgaria, get married and stayed. I can't recall any racism and ethnicism against any of them - there's a different attitude only toward gypsies!

Regarding the pocket-picking - I had a currency exchange business on the main street, and I've witnessed in the past many gypsy troupes "working" tourists. Of course, they wouldn't try to pickpocket from Bulgarians as when they see a gypsy, everybody grabs their bags and protects their belongings. With Bulgaria and Romania joining the EU, these troupes are now all over Europe. Back to when I had that business - often gypsies were coming to me offering me 20% of what they steal if I let them "work" in the store!

And, please, let's not victimize them and point fingers at Bulgarians and Romanians - they are victims but of their own "cultural" heritage! The change can only change if kids are not allowed to be "trained" into being a "gypsy" (the social behavior) by their parents! I don't get why "racist heritage" could be bashed, but "theft heritage" cannot be!

First of all, I'm not calling Bulgarians and Romanians racists. I'm calling _you_ racist.

Secondly, I've tried my best not to bash you nor your countrymen. And I do not even disagree with many things you have said: indeed, some gypsies consider it fair game to steal from tourists, some have no respect for property, etc. Sure. The same could be said of many other discriminated minorities, and I'm pretty sure we've all heard and read the exact same complains that $Xs are just thieves, cannot be educated, will never give away their long heritage of misbehaviour, etc, etc, where $X is the minority of the day and place.

The discriminated minority varies, but what does not vary is the false generalisation ("all $X are thieves"), the scapegoating ("$Xs are why the economy is bad"), and the reassuring feeling of superiority ("we have been nice to $Xs to no avail yet they were never nice to us"). This is exactly what racism is all about in my views.

Listen, I'm not calling you a bad person for that. I totally understand that when pockets of poverty and antisocial behaviour do exist in one's country then one is upset about it. Just be aware that no minority is inherently bad; minorities have their own dynamic that depends upon many things (on top of which: having to live in a ghetto), but not upon the inner biology/heritage/wtv of any individuals. Do not delude yourself into thinking you would behave any different were you born in the same circumstances, into the same ghetto, etc.

I do not know what have the previous regimes tried to end the discrimination and integrate gypsies, and I'm sad if that has failed. I'm certain though that ghettos are not improving anyone's situation, be it in Bulgaria or in France.

Let's always try to think about the problem practically, to look for solutions/improvements not to look for revenge.

I don't care what _you_ call me because that's your personal disoriented _opinion_ and nothing more. Unlike you, I did propose solutions that will work. By calling people racists, you solve no problems - the solution is to root out the reasons for profiling, and this is very much what MLM said about the ghettos in America, too! Most of the issues need to be solved from inside first - you cannot expect people to tolerate systematic and widespread unlawful behavior because some Westerners are victimizing them without bothering to look into the centuries of goodwill efforts! Compare the level of hate crime in Bulgaria to some Democracies in Europe! Yes, we may be pretty blunt about what we don't like about the majority of that minority is doing (yes, this are not empty words, there's a lot of statistics although much of it's not reported because in Bulgaria a theft is considered if something is worth at least a minimum wage and also many Bulgarians don't report these, because they know nothing will be done anyway and that later the criminals will terrorize them much more). I have two relatives who died directly from gypsy terror! They kept terrorizing my grandmother daily and my father later, too, stealing everything, breaking daily in their homes when they were out, and so on. At night, they were attacking my grandmother's house, and she died from a heart attack from this terror, as they kept vandalizing her home, trying to steal everything they can find use in them or sell them for change. It's easy to judge others when you don't have to experience this daily - from the comfort of your home here. I am not saying gypsies are bad people or that all are thieves - not sure where you draw that conclusion from, but that they are allowed to commit crimes, they always claim they are being discriminated against, they regularly attack the couple policemen in small villages and towns, and, yes, they are victims, but victims of their own heritage. Before we talk about human rights, we need to talk about laws and responsibilities as rights build upon a social contract foundation. The liberal view that everybody is a victim, so they are not responsible for what they do simply does not work. And that's why in Italy and France, there are double standards, and gypsies are treated differently, too! So, again, given gypsies are not a racial issue, as Indians live in Bulgaria and nobody profiles them although morphologically their look similarly and belong to the same race - it's the "culture" that people cannot accept and be silent about! If we can live well with Turks, who for 500 years were killing us and terrorizing us under the Ottoman Yoke, why do you think we are so loud about the gypsies? It's because Turks, Armenians, Jews, Russian obey the social contract, and gypsies don't! Although you called me _racist_, I'm working to help greatly a project [0], which is the only solution, and multiple Western organizations back it. It's very much aligned with my vision on how to solve this problem. If you want to learn about it and not just talk empty words, go check it out!

[0]: https://amalipe.bg/en/home-2/

P.S. I forgot to mention that some Protestant churches got into the ghettos, and they educated the gypsies about theft being a bad thing. They are hugely successful, too. So, again, this is another proof that the negative heritage should be rooted out. There's a lot of negative heritage in Bulgaria, also! For example, some pagan rituals, which predate Christianity, such as dog spinning [1]. Should we keep it, because it's heritage! Of course, not!

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_spinning

How can slavery be called integration? Having Roma slaves was a thing much longer after 15th century.

The fact that Romani people successfully integrated in US might indicate that there exists a bigger cultural divide in Europe.

Slaves of Bulgarians or slaves of the Ottomans? Because Bulgarians were Ottoman slaves, too! In fact, gypsies came to Bulgaria through the Ottoman Empire. And I cannot talk about Western Europe and how it treated gypsies as I've never studies it; I can only talk about Bulgaria and we never had slavery, so, can we quite extending Western guilts to Bulgaria?