Re:The Prestige Trap: finance, big tech, and consulting
by quickthrower2 on Saturday November 14, 2020 @09:01PM
(#25097510)
And they sure as hell won’t know what they would have wanted to want in 20 years time.
Re:The Prestige Trap: finance, big tech, and consulting
by srtjstjsj on Saturday November 14, 2020 @10:43PM
(#25098048)
That's the same thing
Re:The Prestige Trap: finance, big tech, and consulting
by OJFord on Sunday November 15, 2020 @05:10AM
(#25099846)
No it isn't, maybe python is clearer:
not think(many({
knowswhattheywant(p)
for p in people
}))
!=
think(many({
not knowswhattheywant(p)
for p in people
}))
Re:The Prestige Trap: finance, big tech, and consulting
by dan-robertson on Sunday November 15, 2020 @06:42AM
(#25100411)
This just isn’t how the semantics of the English language work
Re:The Prestige Trap: finance, big tech, and consulting
by DangitBobby on Sunday November 15, 2020 @01:23PM
(#25103398)
The sentences have different meanings.
"I don't think a lot of people know what they want." -> I believe it is a rare trait in a person to know what they want.
"I think a lot of people don't know what they want." -> I believe it is a common trait for a person not to know what they want.
These things are not mutually exclusive nor mutually inclusive.
Lots of similar sounding statements are subtly different like this in English. "I am not happy" and "I am unhappy" have slightly different meanings as well.
I would go further: I think a lot of people don't know what they want.