News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Gig economy companies spent more than $200M to bankroll Proposition 22. Parent comment

Re:Gig economy companies spent more than $200M to bankroll P... by fennecfoxen on Saturday November 14, 2020 @11:02AM (#25093091)
> This is argument is based off of your misunderstanding of economics

Your superior "understanding" of economics is at odds with academic consensus and with reality.

> Consumers need capital to drive demand

Replacing five McDonalds cashiers with two cashiers, an app, and a touchscreen ordering kiosk doesn't "drive demand".

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gig economy companies spent more than $200M to bankroll P... by gentaro on Sunday November 15, 2020 @10:13AM (#25101770)
> Your superior "understanding" of economics is at odds with academic consensus and with reality.

And yet, you have no counterargument.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gig economy companies spent more than $200M to bankroll P... by fennecfoxen on Thursday November 19, 2020 @10:12PM (#25157008)
the marginal cost of supplying argument has exceeded the marginal benefit (zero)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gig economy companies spent more than $200M to bankroll P... by gentaro on Friday November 27, 2020 @06:38AM (#25227811)
and the supplier is bankrupt.
[ Parent | on HN ]