News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed ... by wins32767 on Friday November 13, 2020 @06:39PM (#25088864)
I hardly think making people face the consequences of their actions is authoritarian, nor is it worse than the callous disregard for other people's lives that many are demonstrating through their actions. People who refuse to take basic precautions are externalizing the costs of their decisions onto the rest of society. Litigation is one way society deals with that problem.

If someone went around having unprotected sex without telling their partners, then I don't see a problem with a civil suit from anyone they infected to make them pay for the damages they inflicted.

If I were to distort your view like you did mine, I'd say that you're arguing for the ability to go around punching anyone else in the face because to prevent you from doing so would be starting down a slippery slope that would lead to authoritarianism.

Re:Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed ... by gnusty_gnurc on Friday November 13, 2020 @07:07PM (#25089042)
> I hardly think making people face the consequences of their actions is authoritarian

"you must face the consequences" is perhaps the most authoritarian thing you could say when arguing in favor of severe penalties.

Re:Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed ... by wins32767 on Friday November 13, 2020 @07:27PM (#25089154)
Severe penalties like a civil lawsuit? I guess doctors who accidentally kill their patients are living an authoritarian dystopia.