News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed ... by newfeatureok on Friday November 13, 2020 @11:57AM (#25084275)
I think it demonstrates how weak enforcement of the rules are. Maine already had rules against such gatherings. Yet it still happened. Why?
Re:Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed ... by dboreham on Friday November 13, 2020 @12:04PM (#25084398)
Because some people are selfish and stupid.

It's fascinating to watch, for example, people commenting on Facebook about vehicles driving too fast in winter conditions, endangering other road users. But those same Facebook commenters will say that nobody can order them to wear a mask...

Re:Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed ... by ryandrake on Friday November 13, 2020 @01:56PM (#25085980)
If governments enforced COVID restrictions as well as they enforce speeding and DUIs, we wouldn't have to rely on people being smart and considerate. All these stay at home "orders" and mask "mandates" and they didn't mean squat and had little effect because almost nobody was fined or went to jail for violating them.

It's the easiest thing to enforce, too. In my city alone, a single police officer with two functioning eyes could probably issue hundreds of mask violations a day. It's not like you have to search someone or go out of your way to see they aren't wearing a mask.

Re:Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed ... by leetcrew on Friday November 13, 2020 @03:09PM (#25086864)
> If governments enforced COVID restrictions as well as they enforce speeding and DUIs, we wouldn't have to rely on people being smart and considerate.

odd comparison to make. I find that in the midatlantic US, speeding and DUI are not enforced very consistently. with speeding, there seem to be only a couple days of the month (usually the last few days) where a bunch of cops are out with radar/lidar pulling people over. with DUI, you are quite likely to get away with it if you aren't intoxicated to the point where your driving is noticeably erratic. the exception would be the few times each year where they actually have checkpoints on certain roads.

> It's the easiest thing to enforce, too. In my city alone, a single police officer with two functioning eyes could probably issue hundreds of mask violations a day. It's not like you have to search someone or go out of your way to see they aren't wearing a mask.

this seems like it could be counterproductive. for one thing, issuing a ticket is necessarily a close physical interaction. for another, what if the interaction goes south and the cop has to grapple with the offender, arrest them, and take them to jail? does this really serve the goal of preventing covid transmission?

Re:Super-spreading wedding demonstrates Covid-19 risk posed ... by no-s on Saturday November 14, 2020 @05:12PM (#25096145)
>> It's fascinating to watch, for example, people commenting on Facebook about vehicles driving too fast in winter conditions, endangering other road users. But those same Facebook commenters will say that nobody can order them to wear a mask...

and vice versa, do you think?