News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Exploding Whale remastered: 50th anniversary of legen... by LeoPanthera on Thursday November 12, 2020 @12:42PM (#25072359)
Perhaps the assumption was that many small pieces would be easier to clean up than one big piece. And that the very small pieces would be removed by other animals, or the weather.

Apparently they vastly overestimated how much explosive to use, resulting in the now infamous consequences.

Re:The Exploding Whale remastered: 50th anniversary of legen... by roywiggins on Thursday November 12, 2020 @12:43PM (#25072382)
According to the article:

"The decision to blow up the whale came from the Oregon Department of Transportation and George Thornton. According to Linnman, Thornton had consulted with the United State Navy, which had done things like this in the past. The general consensus from all involved after the explosion was that not enough dynamite was used."

Re:The Exploding Whale remastered: 50th anniversary of legen... by TheOtherHobbes on Thursday November 12, 2020 @02:39PM (#25073947)
The original call must have been an interesting conversation.

Credit must be due just for getting through switchboard to someone who could give a professional opinion.

Re:The Exploding Whale remastered: 50th anniversary of legen... by tantalor on Thursday November 12, 2020 @02:02PM (#25073499)
> overestimated

Don't you mean underestimated?

Re:The Exploding Whale remastered: 50th anniversary of legen... by throwaway0a5e on Thursday November 12, 2020 @02:17PM (#25073692)
>Apparently they vastly overestimated how much explosive to use,

I disagree. Had they over-estimated there would have simply been pink mist and a bad smell.