News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Honda claims it will launch the first Level 3 autonomous ... by kiplkipl on Thursday November 12, 2020 @12:06PM (#25071887)
Marvel Studios writing it as a baddie is not a very compelling reason to avoid automation. As of today, the vast majority of autonomous devices and robots are factory devices that have minimal input from humans.
Re:Honda claims it will launch the first Level 3 autonomous ... by falcolas on Thursday November 12, 2020 @12:08PM (#25071909)
It might be worth reading beyond the title and into the article itself.

It's a good article with coherent arguments.

Re:Honda claims it will launch the first Level 3 autonomous ... by chrisseaton on Thursday November 12, 2020 @01:16PM (#25072830)
> It might be worth reading beyond the title and into the article itself.

I don't know why authors give their work flippant titles and then are confused when people assume it's a flippant piece of work.

'Don't judge a book by its cover' isn't a reasonable complaint when the author has deliberately given it a silly cover!

Re:Honda claims it will launch the first Level 3 autonomous ... by falcolas on Thursday November 12, 2020 @02:45PM (#25074015)
Or, it's a surprisingly relevant comparison (on the topic of the article) using pop culture references? Augmented humanity vs. the best AI they can create.

When it comes to titles for articles, this is both memorable and far less click-baity as is normal these days.

Re:Honda claims it will launch the first Level 3 autonomous ... by gowld on Thursday November 12, 2020 @05:17PM (#25075934)
Deliberately misinterpreting things isn't useful.

"Don't judge book by a cover" doesn't apply to judging an article by it's title. See how silly it is?