News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Silicon M1 chip in MacBook Air outperforms high-end... by valuearb on Thursday November 12, 2020 @12:00PM (#25071802)
Yet the translated code will still run faster on the M1 than the original code runs on x86.
Re:Apple Silicon M1 chip in MacBook Air outperforms high-end... by marcan_42 on Thursday November 12, 2020 @01:28PM (#25072996)
Citation needed. Not a microbenchmark, or a single example of some software. Actual sustained mixed workload usage of real life applications. Especially realtime-sensitive stuff like DAWs (where you have the added risk that calling into the JIT in the middle of a realtime thread can completely screw you over; keeping realtime-safe code realtime-safe under dynamic or even static binary translation is a whole extra can of worms).
Re:Apple Silicon M1 chip in MacBook Air outperforms high-end... by valuearb on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @01:50AM (#25133886)
Benchmarks are now out, and x86 Chrome is faster on the M1 MacBook Air than the x86 MacBook Air.
Re:Apple Silicon M1 chip in MacBook Air outperforms high-end... by valuearb on Thursday November 12, 2020 @01:54PM (#25073377)
Sustained benchmarks await production hardware. But it will be surprising if Rosetta2 translated apps run slower. Not only will system calls be native, but common operations like retain/release are 2x faster under Rosetta3.

https://mobile.twitter.com/hhariri/status/132678854650246349...

Re:Apple Silicon M1 chip in MacBook Air outperforms high-end... by marcan_42 on Thursday November 12, 2020 @07:53PM (#25077461)
That's a microbenchmark. There are a myriad reasons why one specific thing might be faster under a new CPU even under emulation. That doesn't mean other things won't be much slower.