An updated daily front page of The New York Times as artwork on your wall

Re:An updated daily front page of The New York Times as artw... by luka-birsa on Thursday November 12, 2020 @03:51AM (#25067824)

E Ink owns the majority of the patents, so direct clones of E Ink are being made under license. I do not think that the patents are the limiting factor - the specific applications are somewhat limited compared to widespread use of OLED.

For the applications that have mass apeal we saw that the price goes down to a comparable level of an LCD (eg in ebook readers and shelf labels).

There is also a bunch of innovation happening in the market - competitors like ClearInk are trying to build a better version of E paper, but it's always hard to scale some new technology and it will take some time before anything substantial comes along. E Ink was lucky that they found the killer app in ebook readers and that really helped them get to volumes that allow them to build these screens in commercial volumes.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:An updated daily front page of The New York Times as artw... by Natanael_L on Thursday November 12, 2020 @07:06AM (#25068930)

What do you think of reflective screens like Qualcomm's Mirasol?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:An updated daily front page of The New York Times as artw... by luka-birsa on Thursday November 12, 2020 @08:07AM (#25069410)

Looks like the technology didn't pan out. Not sure what the end reason was, but E Ink won that battle.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:An updated daily front page of The New York Times as artw... by Natanael_L on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @09:18AM (#25123968)

I would actually like to see combination of the two tested. Such as a greyscale high resolution e-ink base and a transparent layer of Mirasol like color pixels that can activate.

Kind of mimicking CMYK from print, and LED TV:s locally adjusting LED backlight to improve contrast ratios, and some high HDR screens. Except a very low energy use variant.

[ Parent | on HN ]