The U.S. Divorce Rate Has Hit a 50-Year Low

Re:The U.S. Divorce Rate Has Hit a 50-Year Low by bluGill on Wednesday November 11, 2020 @12:14PM (#25060279)

In the 1950s women didn't hold a job outside of the house (raising their own kids is a hard job). This isn't completely unheard of today, but it is very rare (also not sexist - I personally know as many men as women who don't have a job outside the home). In this model it is useful to claim a deduction for your spouse.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The U.S. Divorce Rate Has Hit a 50-Year Low by watwut on Wednesday November 11, 2020 @03:07PM (#25062377)

The statistics for 1950 actually have 44% of women between 16-24 having some kind of job, 34% of women between 24-34 and 39% of women between 34-44.

What you describe was middle class white femalehood ideal - what was supposedly happiest setup. But that setup was impossible for quite a lot of families, plus some families choose different setup. And some women were single or their husbands die.

But the actual labor participation was much higher then what the ideal suggests.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The U.S. Divorce Rate Has Hit a 50-Year Low by rhino369 on Wednesday November 11, 2020 @03:43PM (#25062753)

But they were paid a lot less than men at the time.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The U.S. Divorce Rate Has Hit a 50-Year Low by watwut on Wednesday November 11, 2020 @05:04PM (#25063565)

Yes and jobs were also much different. And completely different ratio of these is going to be part vs full time. I am not saying 1950 was feminists utopia or something.

But it is interesting how around 40% women working morphed into women were not working which morphed into idea that working woman would be rare.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The U.S. Divorce Rate Has Hit a 50-Year Low by bluGill on Thursday November 12, 2020 @07:19AM (#25069010)

I want to point out that as the originator of this line of thought in the discussion I fully endorse your last paragraph.

[ Parent | on HN ]