There seems to be a flurry of these articles posted to HN, which are vague, loquacious, superficial, obtuse, poorly punctuated, occasionally excessively poly-syllabic, repetitive, colloquial and plausible, yet ultimately nonsensical.

We need a new adjective for what it is to be like GPT-3 ...

disgenerative?

misformational?

cyberblathering?

babble streaming?

thesaurus gargling?