Re:Covid vaccine: First ‘milestone’ vaccine offers 90% prote...
by Jedd on Monday November 09, 2020 @08:38AM
(#25034659)
You seem to be jumping to an awful lot of conclusions without really explaining what you understand is happening here.
(I note that I don't understand at all what you're asserting.)
Re:Covid vaccine: First ‘milestone’ vaccine offers 90% prote...
by gscho on Monday November 09, 2020 @08:36AM
(#25034640)
> Intentionally murdering possibly thousands of people (or tens of thousands? or what, who knows?!) for some assumed political gain is absolutely, 100% an unreasonable decision for any human to make. Intentionally delaying a vaccine would certainly be a crime, no? Not to mention absolutely abhorrent and completely evil.
You mean delaying the announcement of a vaccine. They didn't delay the process.
Re:Covid vaccine: First ‘milestone’ vaccine offers 90% prote...
by woofie11 on Monday November 09, 2020 @07:17PM
(#25041557)
No. I didn't write "Intentionally murdering possibly thousands of people" or "Intentionally delaying a vaccine"
I wrote "We're talking about announcing a result a few weeks earlier versus later."
And if that was the goal, I think it worked. It looks like Biden won by literally tens of thousands votes. An announcement a week earlier probably would have swung the election to Trump.
At a cost of zero lives.
If the vaccine works as announced, we're still weeks away from the end of the trial, and months away from widespread distribution.
Intentionally murdering possibly thousands of people (or tens of thousands? or what, who knows?!) for some assumed political gain is absolutely, 100% an unreasonable decision for any human to make. Intentionally delaying a vaccine would certainly be a crime, no? Not to mention absolutely abhorrent and completely evil.
That is not a "reasonable decision" to make by any stretch of the imagination.