Re:EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf]
by NoImmatureAdHom on Monday November 09, 2020 @09:31AM
(#25035161)
I would bet basically anything that inferring "did commit" from "is suspect" works very well in aggregate.
Re:EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf]
by bildung on Wednesday November 11, 2020 @08:36AM
(#25058247)
"Recent figures show that only 15 percent of all crimes are solved." https://sverigesradio.se/artikel/5399870
That low resolution rate alone introduces a margin of error that is larger than the difference between immigrant and non-immigrant suspects. It is therefore possible that the much higher immigrant suspect rate is entirely a result of biases.
Re:EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf]
by nitrogen on Monday November 09, 2020 @12:51PM
(#25037430)
This doesn't work numerically if each crime averages more than one suspect.
Re:EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf]
by NoImmatureAdHom on Monday November 09, 2020 @06:39PM
(#25041305)
This is a good point! I wonder how often that's the case...
Stastistics about suspects are most commonly used in studies like these because the police, due to the seperation of powers, usually has no or at least less statistics of the actual results of charges.