Juicesync: Parallelized Rsync for Cloud Storage

Posted by daviesliu on Monday November 09, 2020 @02:24AM
from the github.com dept.

( 7 comments | 28 points | on HN )

Re:Juicesync: Parallelized Rsync for Cloud Storage by vandreykiv on Monday November 09, 2020 @11:53PM (#25042909)

Hello, What is the benefits comparing with rclone? I think rclone can do much much more and also free and open source

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Juicesync: Parallelized Rsync for Cloud Storage by daviesliu on Tuesday November 10, 2020 @09:10AM (#25046063)

Juicesync support HDFS, can copy data using multiple machines, which is game killer if you have petabytes of data.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Juicesync: Parallelized Rsync for Cloud Storage by vlovich123 on Tuesday November 10, 2020 @01:49AM (#25043388)

Is this not free & open source?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Juicesync: Parallelized Rsync for Cloud Storage by Seirdy on Tuesday November 10, 2020 @12:25AM (#25043037)

This looks like a clone of rclone that supports fewer services, built by a company whose main product is a proprietary filesystem.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Juicesync: Parallelized Rsync for Cloud Storage by daviesliu on Tuesday November 10, 2020 @09:08AM (#25046042)

Good point.

Juicesync does support less service, but has better coverage for enterprise (Rclone does much better for individuals).

Btw, we are on the way to open source JuiceFS.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Juicesync: Parallelized Rsync for Cloud Storage by miniman1337 on Tuesday November 10, 2020 @01:55AM (#25043412)

I'm wondering how this is better than rclone?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Juicesync: Parallelized Rsync for Cloud Storage by daviesliu on Tuesday November 10, 2020 @09:01AM (#25045975)

Juicesync is simper (fewer command line options) and faster (using multiple threads and machines) than rclone.

disclaimer: worked on juicesync

[ Parent | on HN ]