News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf] by ben_w on Sunday November 08, 2020 @06:51PM (#25030181)
So long as it looks normal for you, I suspect you’d be fine.

If I started writing long paragraphs of aforementioned hereinafter notwithstanding including but not limited to senseless nonsense, I’d be really obvious — at least to a human, not sure if current AI would notice me yet.

Re:EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf] by floatboth on Sunday November 08, 2020 @08:45PM (#25030661)
Plausible deniability though – who said you can't have a hobby of intentionally making up nonsense texts, sending them to friends to laugh at?

(Of course the public existence of software that does this could definitely make that excuse less convincing.)

Re:EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf] by dheera on Sunday November 08, 2020 @10:17PM (#25031143)
Hmm, I think a better strategy might be embedding the ciphertext in the fur of cat pictures. Sending lots of cat pictures seems pretty normal for anyone. Might be possible to create a GAN that outputs a synthesized cat picture with a constraint of some ciphertext that can be decoded later. Or simple modulation might just work, if I can convince JPEG to not wreck it.
Re:EU Draft Council Declaration Against Encryption [pdf] by ben_w on Monday November 09, 2020 @03:58AM (#25032784)
That is higher bandwidth, but for normal chat apps I would expect randomly applied compression in transit breaking things. Email could work though? And if you’re generating the JPEG or PNG yourself, you can put the cypher text in at whatever level you like, including highest entropy bits of the compressed data.

You’d have to be very careful to seem “normal”, as carelessly doing that can change the entropy in a detectable way even for the least significant bits — the least significant bits saved in something like JPEG is not the sensor noise, it’s the smallest stuff that humans pay attention to.