Re:Large Corporations Aren’t Going to Save the Real Linux Co...
by bigbubba on Sunday November 08, 2020 @03:19PM
(#25028615)
I'd say GPLv3 avoidance demonstrates respect[fear] of the license, not abuse of it. To abuse it would be to use that software while not respecting the terms of the license.
Re:Large Corporations Aren’t Going to Save the Real Linux Co...
by jmclnx on Sunday November 08, 2020 @03:41PM
(#25028800)
I missed pointing out GPL2 is rather easy to abuse, i edited my original post.
Yes, Large Companies is scared of the GPL3 and we are told specifically never use any GPL3 software where I work :)
Re:Large Corporations Aren’t Going to Save the Real Linux Co...
by fxtentacle on Sunday November 08, 2020 @03:25PM
(#25028673)
Like CISCO, Gigabyte, D-Link, NETGEAR, AVM, FANTEC, Iliad, ...
Re:Large Corporations Aren’t Going to Save the Real Linux Co...
by ghaff on Sunday November 08, 2020 @04:38PM
(#25029324)
GPLv2 vs. v3 seems to be more a matter of inertia. Yes, a few have concerns about the TiVo-ization language. But a lot of it is that projects like Linux were already under GPLv2 and Linus wasn't interested in changing--and, absent copyright assignment, doing so would have been at least somewhat controversial and would necessarily rely on legal theories not everyone would have been on board with.
(edit, I meant easy to abuse GPL2, but GPL3 ias hard to abuse)
Personality I believe the final nail was the "coup" at the FSF with RMS. He could be a pain at times, but almost all his fears about the future of computing is slowly coming true.