So we have one side saying "You're caught up in conspiracy theories!" and the other saying "You're censoring the truth!"
How do you solve that?
You encourage empathy for those you disagree with.
You tolerate intolerant people (but not their intolerant views)
Verification takes time, when someone dumps a ton of information publicly and exclaims it is true there is no avoiding some people believing it no matter what happens.
If we are afraid about censoring that being transparent about what is censored and verifying it afterwards can help with that.
However I don't think there is a true solve to misinformation. Lies are catchier than the truth after all.
I wonder whether reverting to more neutral labelling would held create a less heated dialogue? Founded and unfounded, for example.
QAnon is obviously garbage, but it’s a symptom of a broken system that can’t effectively represent the entire population, and not just one half.
It's real-world verifiable that Hunter Biden made 600k/yr for several years for a foreign gas company while his dad was VP and involved in pressuring domestic politics in that country.
And so we come back to GP's point: If mainstream media is calling everything that's not politically advantageous for the dems a "conspiracy theory", then they lose credibility. If everything's a conspiracy theory, nothing is.