Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by beaner on Saturday November 07, 2020 @04:24PM
(#25019570)
Federal law overrules local law, so they are intertwined. A vote at the federal level is in many ways a vote on local laws, too.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by bigwavedave on Saturday November 07, 2020 @04:39PM
(#25019740)
While technically true, this isn't always the case in practice. After all, marijuana is still illegal in the eyes of the Federal Government but this has done very little to deter state-sanctioned dispensaries in more than a handful of states.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by beaner on Saturday November 07, 2020 @04:43PM
(#25019780)
That means it sometimes is the case in practice.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by bigwavedave on Saturday November 07, 2020 @05:57PM
(#25020516)
I wasn't disputing that. I was pointing out that there are notable exceptions.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by beaner on Saturday November 07, 2020 @07:20PM
(#25021326)
Okay. I guess I'm saying that's irrelevant. For local & federal law to be intertwined doesn't require there to be a lack of exceptions.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by bylfdsa on Saturday November 07, 2020 @04:53PM
(#25019884)
Not fully. It's already pointed out that federal law overrules state law, but it's important to remember that congress is only supposed to be able to make federal law on a small set of enumerated issues. IMO the issue is when you have an expansion of what congress is able to make laws on which limits what states can do.
This is true even if we got rid of the senate, the EC, and every federal body had purely population-proportional representation (which I am in favor of).