News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ... by URfejk on Saturday November 07, 2020 @02:25PM (#25018002)
US hegemony is already gone.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ... by bumby on Saturday November 07, 2020 @02:28PM (#25018031)
Who has replaced the US in this regard?

I think you can make a strong case US hegemony may be in decline, but it’s harder to claim it’s gone

Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ... by throw0101a on Saturday November 07, 2020 @02:58PM (#25018521)
> Who has replaced the US in this regard?

Why do you assume it was/will be replaced?

It could go back to the laissez-faire system that was present when all the European powers were running around basically doing anything they wanted. (It should be noted that the US wasn't as isolationist as the propaganda would have you believe: how else did they get pre-revolution Cuba, PR, Guam, Hawaii, etc.?)

Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ... by bumby on Saturday November 07, 2020 @03:56PM (#25019227)
I think these systems align to a certain power dynamic. Because of national sovereignty, its already as close to a laissez faire approach as you can get, yet there’s a hierarchy across virtually any dimension you want to measure. So if the US loses, for example, its economic hegemony another country will take its place. Same with military or any other measure.

I don’t think the US has been isolationist since before the Spanish American war.

Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ... by sterlind on Saturday November 07, 2020 @02:51PM (#25018422)
China's Belt and Road program seems to be establishing a competitor hegemony in the eastern sphere of influence, rather than directly replacing the US. They're building a lot of infrastructure in Africa, expanding their already massive supply chain and working effectively towards surviving a disconnection from the West.

I agree that US hegemony isn't gone yet, but we've lost so much of our manufacturing and materials sourcing that we'll soon need them more than they need us.

Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ... by marktangotango on Saturday November 07, 2020 @02:30PM (#25018062)
The US eleven aircraft carrier battle groups tend to disagree.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ... by kenned3 on Saturday November 07, 2020 @04:51PM (#25019871)
How are those battle ship groups funded? Foreign debt? When was the last time the US had a balanced budget?

Having a nice battleship group does little for the average american public.

"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities. It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population. It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals. It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement. We pay for a single fighter with a half-million bushels of wheat. We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8,000 people. . . . This is not a way of life at all, in any true sense. Under the cloud of threatening war, it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron." Eisenhower

Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ... by jessaustin on Saturday November 07, 2020 @02:41PM (#25018253)
Just leave some derelict ships adrift; USA navy will run into them.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ... by rtx on Saturday November 07, 2020 @02:38PM (#25018183)
Sitting ducks, more of aliablity today.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ... by marktangotango on Saturday November 07, 2020 @02:40PM (#25018232)
People always allude to this, and it's true an adversary could (probably, maybe) sink one aircraft carrier. That same adversary wouldn't sink a second.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ... by PenisBanana on Saturday November 07, 2020 @02:56PM (#25018500)
Back in reality, it's true [China] could ... sink 15 aircraft carriers [in an hour].

That same adversary wouldn't sink a second [15 carriers in the next hour . . . 'cos they'll all be sunk]

Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ... by Supermancho on Saturday November 07, 2020 @03:38PM (#25019039)
https://thediplomat.com/2020/09/pentagon-releases-annual-chi...

> Back in reality, it's true [China] could ... sink 15 aircraft carriers [in an hour].

That is unlikely. The Chinese military relies on a combination of overwhelming manpower and tactical positioning, not aircraft superiority and tactical missile deployment (although they are equipping with more and more ballistic missiles). This puts the US at a distinct advantage in almost every conflict with the Chinese military. This includes the South Seas.

The presence of the 5 US carriers* off Singapore has deterred the staged Chinese invasion force for the last few months

https://www.stripes.com/news/pacific/china-sends-two-aircraf... - 3 carriers sent.

2 More were sent by Trump in September (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvgKgLVPckA). .

Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ... by Fnoord on Saturday November 07, 2020 @03:54PM (#25019211)
I was going to say China would use submarines for such, but they don't appear to have many (in contrast to USA) [1]. My next consideration would be China's red team (APT) but I'm unsure about aircraft carriers being hackable. I mean, it'd make a great fiction novel, perhaps a sequel to Cryptonomicon. Where does China's military strength lie?

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_submarine_classes_in_s...