Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by cblconfederate on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:59PM
(#25017553)
It feels like twitter staff are (ab)using the popularity of its users to promote their own agenda. That is not right and will probably have implications about their relationship with Article 230 (which IIRC assumes "good faith"). It's not fair to other biased media, which are legally liable for what they publish.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by JoshTriplett on Saturday November 07, 2020 @02:14PM
(#25017795)
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by cblconfederate on Saturday November 07, 2020 @02:47PM
(#25018342)
this is what i m talking about
> any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by JoshTriplett on Saturday November 07, 2020 @02:53PM
(#25018452)
The article I linked specifically addresses why that isn't a concern.