Re:Violating the Benford's Law
by aapl88888 on Saturday November 07, 2020 @03:57AM
(#25013925)
You're arguing with a side that is using statistical analysis to detect fraud. Meanwhile your arguments are:
- "fixation on wildly cherry picked data and missaplied (sic) statistics is the conspiracy theory"
- "There are already court cases with the best experts in the land looking at the counts"
- "They are starting to be laughed out of court because they have no evidence to support their claims"
I don't find your arguments compelling because you are arguing to authority. You also use a case that was dismissed that has nothing to do with Benford's Law. Please address specifically what data is being cherry picked and why Benford's Law shouldn't apply in this election.
- "fixation on wildly cherry picked data and missaplied (sic) statistics is the conspiracy theory"
- "There are already court cases with the best experts in the land looking at the counts"
- "They are starting to be laughed out of court because they have no evidence to support their claims"
I don't find your arguments compelling because you are arguing to authority. You also use a case that was dismissed that has nothing to do with Benford's Law. Please address specifically what data is being cherry picked and why Benford's Law shouldn't apply in this election.