> not so elegant under the hood
Could you explain this? IIRC they kept the language simple so that they can keep things elegant in tooling / compilers / etc as well. Or is this about the runtime?
Could you explain this? IIRC they kept the language simple so that they can keep things elegant in tooling / compilers / etc as well. Or is this about the runtime?
Go is great for readability and changing of code, depending on the dev and time though.