Re:San Francisco voters approve taxes on highly paid CEOs, b...
by mypalmike on Thursday November 05, 2020 @11:09PM
(#25004806)
When I lived in the bay area, lots of my friends lived in shared accommodation because they actually liked living with other people. Saving money was a side effect. They usually bought a place when they got married or not long after. That's not poverty.
Re:San Francisco voters approve taxes on highly paid CEOs, b...
by anonyxyz on Friday November 06, 2020 @07:18AM
(#25007087)
This is common when you're a kid out of college, but a few years go by and living with other people sucks.
Re:San Francisco voters approve taxes on highly paid CEOs, b...
by opportune on Thursday November 05, 2020 @11:51PM
(#25005009)
Maybe I am just a frugal person, but to me, if you told me I could get a post-tax extra 10k a year switching from a 1bed apartment to a roommate situation I would always take it as long as I could find reasonable people to live with. I was pretty far from poverty when I made that decision in the SF bay area. And again, I just said they could afford a 1bed apartment, not that this was the max they could afford. You're not being charitable with interpreting my reply.
Re:San Francisco voters approve taxes on highly paid CEOs, b...
by titanomachy on Friday November 06, 2020 @01:13AM
(#25005372)
> living with roommates to save 10K a year does sound like one step above poverty.
Sounds like every college student and recent grad I've ever known.
In most cities in the US this is not the definition of wealthy or even well off. living with roommates to save 10K a year does sound like one step above poverty.