Kraken – P2P Docker Registry

Re:Kraken – P2P Docker Registry by majewsky on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @08:37AM (#24979508)

Most organizations are not Google or Facebook or Uber, so setting up a P2P network of registries is ghoulish overkill. Any image registry with a HA setup (e.g. API pods in Kubernetes and backing storage in Ceph or a NetApp cluster or whatever) is probably enough.

Source: I've implemented a federating image registry for use at $dayjob (https://github.com/sapcc/keppel). Before doing so, I evaluated the landscape and also looked at Kraken briefly.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Kraken – P2P Docker Registry by LockAndLol on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @06:17PM (#24985138)

Since you have experience writing your own registry, do you think it would be difficult to support IPFS (or a similar distributed storage technology) for pulling images? I'm thinking HTTP for metadata and IPFS for storage could reduce the load on registries significantly, but I know very little about registries.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Kraken – P2P Docker Registry by majewsky on Saturday November 07, 2020 @06:43PM (#25021003)

Conceptually, no big deal. Most registries already deliver blob contents from a CDN or object store (via HTTP redirect). However, the registry protocol (i.e. the Open Containers Distribution API) only knows HTTP, so you'd have to use a HTTP-to-IPFS proxy to use the IPFS backing store with existing clients.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Kraken – P2P Docker Registry by jacques_chester on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @02:34PM (#24983111)

Thanks for the keppel link. Impressive work.

[ Parent | on HN ]