Re:Ox is a fast text editor, written in Rust, that runs in y...
by kstenerud on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @03:55AM
(#24977769)
I never used autocomplete until my fourth programming language. By that point, trying to write anything was an exercise in frustration as I constantly mixed keywords, namespaces and functions from the other languages.
Nowadays, I just leave autocomplete on for minimal flow break no matter what language I'm using at the moment. I don't want language-specific names and structures interrupting the flow of models and ideas from my head.
Re:Ox is a fast text editor, written in Rust, that runs in y...
by snarfy on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @10:01AM
(#24980197)
OP's position doesn't work very well the more you generalize. I had OP's philosophy when all I was doing was low level C code. It doesn't work very well when you are switching between yaml, python, c++, c#, typescript all with different libraries, coding standards, and naming conventions. By the time you no longer need the reference to remember, the reference changes.
Re:Ox is a fast text editor, written in Rust, that runs in y...
by svennek on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @10:53AM
(#24980719)
For me, it works with 5+ languages I write (production) code in at least every month...
I don't know how it is for others.
Also, I really try to minimize complexity and not ending up in the javascript npm dependency spaghetti..
Good code is simple and obvious....
Re:Ox is a fast text editor, written in Rust, that runs in y...
by svennek on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @10:49AM
(#24980692)
> I still think aurocomplete might be faster for libraries you haven't used much before, but it doesn't sound at all unbelievable to me that the brain works as stated.
Possibly, but I still need to read the librarys documentation carefully, where I plan my code anyways...
I have seen so many "auto coders" write 100+ lines of extra code because they missed reading the manual carefully and doing it correctly/efficiently...
If lines of code is your metric, that is great, if not, not...
I read OP's position as: If you don't use aurocomplete you'll remember the naming variations better, and won't have to look them up all the time.
I still think aurocomplete might be faster for libraries you haven't used much before, but it doesn't sound at all unbelievable to me that the brain works as stated.