News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tunnels in the US cost more than anywhere else by dcolkitt on Monday November 02, 2020 @07:14PM (#24974965)
What 100 year horizon? Manhattan has a 30% smaller lower population today than it did in 1920. Even pre-Covid, Manhattan was one of the slowest growing major counties in America.
Re:Tunnels in the US cost more than anywhere else by xyzzyz on Monday November 02, 2020 @08:09PM (#24975313)
Population is not very relevant metric here. What matters is not so much how many people actually live in Manhattan, but rather how many people are commuting into it every day. In fact, commuters double the island population every day, and exceed the number of residents in 1920 by 50%.

What happened with Manhattan was that tenements were replaced with office buildings, and these use more, not less commuting.

Re:Tunnels in the US cost more than anywhere else by kevin_thibedeau on Monday November 02, 2020 @11:23PM (#24976274)
Manhattan commuters peaked in 1946. The train system was able handle that level of demand without falling apart. All of the messaging from MTA about increasing ridership causing delays is a disingenuous lie.
Re:Tunnels in the US cost more than anywhere else by StanislavPetrov on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @02:02AM (#24977157)
Considering the fact that much of the same infrastructure they used in 1946 is still in use today (with 74 more years of wear and tear) its not surprising that its falling apart. This would be true even if the MTA wasn't staffed by dishonest, incompetent political cronies. When you regularly do things like spend $600 million dollars on trains that don't work, its not hard to see how you end up billions in debt very quickly.

https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ny-l-train-normal-servi...

Re:Tunnels in the US cost more than anywhere else by Schiendelman on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @06:05AM (#24978480)
Man, you’re really taking a few numbers from decades ago and using that to claim something’s a lie? You ok?