News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Is a billion dollars worth of server lying on the ground?. Parent comment

Re:Is a billion dollars worth of server lying on the ground? by notyourwork on Monday November 02, 2020 @01:41PM (#24971480)
It is a large site by traffic measure but I would guess the traffic is heavily read only. Managing workloads with more data mutation introduces different complexities which mean you can't just cache everything and accept the TTL for writes based on cache invalidation.

edit: To be clear, not saying SO isn't an achievement, but its one type of use case that yields a really simple tech stack.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Is a billion dollars worth of server lying on the ground? by thu2111 on Monday November 02, 2020 @04:59PM (#24973940)
Their stats are here:

https://stackexchange.com/performance

Their DB handles peak of 11,000 qps and peaks at only 15% CPU usage. That's after caching. There are also some ElasticSearch servers. Sure, their traffic is heavily read only, but it's also a site that exists purely for user-generated content. They could probably handle far higher write loads than they do, and they handle a lot of traffic as-is.

What specific complexities would be introduced by an even higher write load that AWS specifically would help them address?

[ Parent | on HN ]