News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Names are not type safety by chrisoverzero on Monday November 02, 2020 @12:32PM (#24970677)
I'm going by the Rust documentation: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/rust-by-example/generics/ne...

(I was going to be cheeky here, but Git history shows you didn't write any of this part.)

Re:Names are not type safety by steveklabnik on Monday November 02, 2020 @03:05PM (#24972551)
Hehe yeah, I mean, I am not 100% sure myself, which is why I asked.

There's no real difference between a 1-tuple struct and the regular struct, other than the name. So to me, it feels like either are both newtypes. But, I guess I could see some sort of argument the other way too.

Re:Names are not type safety by lexi-lambda on Monday November 02, 2020 @05:38PM (#24974307)
In Haskell, a newtype can be a single-field record with a named field, so from a Haskell perspective, I would definitely consider both of them “newtypes.”