News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Case Against More Ethanol (2016) by bluedino on Monday November 02, 2020 @11:50AM (#24970121)
It's terrible for your engine/fuel system. Attracts water, increases rust, breaks down faster. It's also less efficient than gas, it takes 1.5 gallons of ethanol to equal the amount of energy in 1 gallon of gasoline.
Re:The Case Against More Ethanol (2016) by hinkley on Monday November 02, 2020 @01:34PM (#24971409)
It is also a solvent that can dissolve parts used in vehicles not designed for ethanol. Automakers complained because it'd cost them something like an extra $100 per vehicle under the hood.

I recall watching an uncle rebuild grandma's carburetor, because her car kept flooding. He shows me part of the original fuel jet and the replacement. The new one has a little synthetic grommet on it, the old one has an empty notch in the same spot. They blamed it on the ethanol.

Re:The Case Against More Ethanol (2016) by SomeHacker44 on Monday November 02, 2020 @02:13PM (#24971861)
In Saranac Lake, NY, there are several gas stations that sell unethanolated gasoline. It costs as much as super, despite having lower octane rating. I use it for boats. Some planes can also use it; though most planes using gasoline still use 100 octane (ethanol free) leaded gas.
Re:The Case Against More Ethanol (2016) by bluedino on Monday November 02, 2020 @03:37PM (#24972951)
We have a couple stations in town that sell 'Rec fuel', which has no ethanol. It's popular for use in things like ATV's, dirtbikes, small engines like lawn mowers and snowblower.
Re:The Case Against More Ethanol (2016) by snarf21 on Monday November 02, 2020 @12:39PM (#24970745)
Additionally that means more tankers transporting ethanol and more weight on normal use compared to fuel output without ethanol.